How The Center-Left Gins Up Paranoia

Jesse Walker at Reason has written one of those articles that explains and provides a context for a phenomenon we are already well-aware of: The way the progressive left uses isolated incidents of violence to indict and discredit the right.

The (Holocaust Museum) killer was soon identified as James Wenneker von Brunn, an 88-year-old neo-Nazi. Von Brunn acted alone, but there was no shortage of voices eager to spread the blame for his crime. The murder was quickly linked, in a free-associative way, to the assassination 10 days earlier of the Kansas abortionist George Tiller. This, we were told, was a “pattern” of “rising right-wing violence.”

More imaginative pundits tried to tie the two slayings to a smattering of other crimes, from an April shootout in Pittsburgh that killed three cops to a year-old double murder at a Knoxville Unitarian church. The longest such list, assembled by the liberal blogger Sara Robinson, included nine diverse incidents linked only by the fact that the criminals all hailed from one corner or another of the paranoid right. One of the episodes involved a mentally disturbed anti-Semite who had stalked a former classmate for two years before killing her in May. “This is how terrorism begins,” Robinson warned.

The left refuses to let a shooting at the Holocaust museum, or the murder of an abortionist be the work of an isolated nutjob. Even though the shooting of the abortionist was condemned universally among pro-life organizations, the left still smelled a conspiracy in which Bill O’Reilly inflamed the rhetoric and Sarah Palin handed the gun to the shooter.

The goal is, of course, to stifle debate. The left can’t defend ObamaCare on the merits (it has none), so they accuse opponents of being “brownshirts” or “Un-American.” The left would rather accuse the right of wanting to assassinate Obama than actually try to defend his policies.

Does the right do this, too? Yeah, sort of and sometimes. But the big differences are 1.) we don’t have a media apparatus to propagandize on our behalf. And, 2.) on the whole, we are more eager to engage in substantive debate. The right is more likely to say, “Obama’s policies are Marxist because they enhance state power in the following ways…” The left is more likely to shout, “Racist! Dick Cheney eats babies!”

This is why the dominant right-wing media format is talk radio, where callers can challenge the host. The left prefers the MSM format where an anointed elite reads the talking points and the audience is expected to sit and listen.

813_image_16

You may now discuss your views on health care

Advertisements

4 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

4 responses to “How The Center-Left Gins Up Paranoia

  1. Pingback: How The Center-Left Gins Up Paranoia | stream4.me

  2. It’s true. If liberals are correct in their views than why not let them enter the marketplace of ideas and see them succeed? Instead they shout and scream in an effort to drown out truth.

  3. Cylar

    “This is how terrorism begins,” Robinson warned.

    No word yet on whether sharia creep in Michigan has anything to do with the beginnings of terrorism.

  4. The Doktor

    I mentioned that the Fort Hood killer was Muslim and my “It’s about time we had a Black president” son mentioned Ted Kaczynski. I retorted with,

    “Out of literally thousands of infamous terrorist attacks you can think of ONE out of the TWO most famous ones that weren’t done by Muslims.”

    Doktor Dad

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s