CBS News Shocked at Public Resistance to Bailing Out Irresponsible Deadbeats

“There seems to be real bitterness about the idea of forcing people to subsidize the imprudent housing choices of their neighbors.”

No, ya think?

I am reminded of Ben Bernanke’s lame-ass defense of the Federal mortgage bailout plan… the plan by which people bought houses they could afford with loans they wouldn’t pay back. (Or, took out second mortgages they couldn’t afford based on their ridiculously overvalued homes.) Bernanke compared this to a neighbor whose house caught fire because he was smoking in bed.

“You could punish him by refusing to send the fire dept and then he would learn his lesson, but unfortunately in the process you’d have the entire neighborhood burning down.”

Economic Disconnect points out why this metaphor is stupid. “My neighbor’s house is NOT on fire Mr. Bernanke– it’s just overvalued. … When his house goes into foreclosure, he moves into housing he can afford, and I can buy the house I’ve been waiting for. It sounds like a good plan to me, and you want to mess it up for both of us.”

I agree.

The angle CBS is missing is that people are getting alarmed about the aggregate cost of all these bailouts. If the government hadn’t just spent $780 Billion on a useless stimulus, and $700 Billion on a Wall Street Bailout… Maybe people would be more receptive to the plan to spend $275 Billion bailing out bad mortgages. Charity has its limits. There’s no Biblical injunction to cripple yourself in order to bailout those who won’t take responsibility for their own bad choices.

Our houses are not on fire, but maybe our government should be...

Our houses are not on fire, but maybe our government should be...

Hat Tip: Alex The Chick


1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

One response to “CBS News Shocked at Public Resistance to Bailing Out Irresponsible Deadbeats

  1. The banks should have been bailed out first — before the stimulus debacle (which doesn’t have much effect until 2010 and 2011 –closer to the next election, but that is just a coincidence, I’m sure). Some banks are lending, and some are going under. The new SEC Chairman is complaining that she doesn’t have enough funding to guarantee accounts.

    And could we try to get these things fixed before we wander off the reservation and start playing with cap-and-trade and banning coal and health care all at the same time? Is there a misguided plan here, purposeful wreckage, or just sheer incompetence?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s